Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 11:46:28 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: scottl@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0R todo list - hash sizes Message-ID: <20051001154628.GA64006@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > Hi, >=20 > scottl@ removed: > <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small > hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td> >=20 > this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commi= ts > to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then? It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago. Kris --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDPq9UWry0BWjoQKURAhnHAKDnPk9l/xrlJhthD37VDdhBCJ4HygCdEXSj 7nkMAkoxy0N9Jbn61dSMRsA= =bTym -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051001154628.GA64006>