Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:01:32 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: yar@comp.chem.msu.su Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, keramida@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SENDMAIL_MC & making world Message-ID: <20051009.210132.13313527.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20051009082017.GB81198@comp.chem.msu.su> <20051009171512.GA2523@flame.pc> <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su>
Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> writes:
: On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:15:12PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
: >
: > I've always found __MAKE_CONF very useful, but it's not documented in
: > the ``obvious'' places (i.e. the manpage). I think I should add at
: > least a note about it in the manpage of make
:
: FWIW, we have make.conf(5) manpage already, and __MAKE_CONF seems
: to belong to it better than to make(1). make(1) xrefs make.conf(5)
: already. I think I can do the job if you are busy with something
: else currently.
__MAKE_CONF should be documented in make(1) since it is in
/usr/share/mk/sys.mk and global to the entire system for all make jobs
(not just those controlled by buildworld). It should also be in
make.conf(5).
Warner
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051009.210132.13313527.imp>