Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 02:53:35 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: docs/87073: New article: Maintaining and contributing to the FreeBSD Ports Collection Message-ID: <20051010025335.10d473ee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20051009170105.GE22643@soaustin.net> References: <200510071804.j97I4jOD099219@freefall.freebsd.org> <20051009132205.6478a5fb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051009170105.GE22643@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:01:05 -0500 linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:22:05PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Maybe it would make sense to cross-reference this in both PH (as PH > > is a technical document, e.g. answer very detailed to how but > > doesn't give you as fast the big picture) and Ports chapter in > > Handbook (both to encourage people being maintainers and to provide > > some better understanding towards maintainers). > > Absolutely. I think first I'll just try to get it committed so at > least we can be referring people to it. After that I think we'll > find things to tweak up in it, too. :) > As has been discussed (possibly off-list) there's stuff in the PH that > isn't technical and that stuff needs to go "somewhere" And stuff that isn't there but should be :) (from time to time) I'm thinking if we shouldn't impose documenting in PH the new things that go in bsd.*.mk's files (the things that are supposed to go in CHANGES). (don't commit if you don't document it in PH or at least provide a non-doc-book version so more proficient doc people can do it fast). -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051010025335.10d473ee>