Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:14:36 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: thierry@herbelot.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loss of ed(4) in a RC1 booted in qemu Message-ID: <20051013.151436.85394837.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200510132251.00632.thierry@herbelot.com> References: <200510131859.03307.thierry@herbelot.com> <20051013.135851.02300147.imp@bsdimp.com> <200510132251.00632.thierry@herbelot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200510132251.00632.thierry@herbelot.com>
Thierry Herbelot <thierry@herbelot.com> writes:
: Le Thursday 13 October 2005 21:58, M. Warner Losh a =E9crit :
: >
: > I'll be fixing this in the next day or three and it will be MFC'd f=
rom
: > head into RC2 when that happens. I'm not sure where the snapshots
: > are, but there's a patch floating around to get around the qemu iss=
ue
: > just posted if you can't wait. I plan on trying it now with RC1. =
I
: > also plan on looking into the ne2000.c emulation to see why things =
are
: > failing (eg, is it a flaw in the RTL8029 emulation, or a flaw in if=
_ed
: > somewhere).
: =
: Great ! I'll try the patch ASAP
Looks like it is a combination of problems. The PCI registers claim
to be a 8029, but it doesn't emulate the 8029 specific registers. I
have a patch for this. In addition, the ed driver has a mistake in
its 8029 support. I've fixed this as well and am testing the result.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051013.151436.85394837.imp>