Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:03:46 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: doug@polands.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression in device ath between BETA5 and RC1? Message-ID: <20051020.220346.13027284.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20051020232308.GA77950@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051020223340.GA60914@xor.obsecurity.org> <43581E5C.4010006@polands.org> <20051020232308.GA77950@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20051020232308.GA77950@xor.obsecurity.org>
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
: On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
: > Kris Kennaway wrote:
: > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:11:41PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
: > >
: > >
: > >>I was seeing this behavior a lot on 5.2.1, 5.3, and, IIRC, 5.4.
: > >>Responsiveness was so poor as to make remote SSH sessions unusable.
: > >>When I installed -CURRENT then RELENG_6, then the NIC started performing
: > >>beautifully. Very stable and consistent. Now, with yesterday's cvsup'd
: > >>to RC1, the NIC/driver is performing poorly again.
: > >
: > >
: > >Go back to the previous version to verify it's not environmental or
: > >some other problem than a regression in FreeBSD.
: > >
: > Sure, can you tell me what tag to use in my supfile? Right now I have:
: >
: > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
:
: Use a date instead of a tag (see the cvsup docs).
*default release=cvs date=2005.10.10.12.23.45
and try to find where, since June, the divergence of performance was.
We branched RELENG_6 in June, and there's been much merged from head
back into RELENG_6.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051020.220346.13027284.imp>