Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:08:40 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/87898: Failt to init X: can't open device/io Message-ID: <20051025180840.GA48844@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200510241405.32776.joao@matik.com.br> References: <200510240520.j9O5KH6j006068@freefall.freebsd.org> <435CE83E.8070402@samsco.org> <200510241405.32776.joao@matik.com.br>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:05:32PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > On Monday 24 October 2005 10:57, Scott Long wrote: > > I think that we should revert to making the mem and io devices present > > by default in the kernel. People are constantly tripping over the > > current scheme. We can define a kernel option (i.e. NO_IO_DEVICE) for > > those who specifically want to exclude it. > > > > I think most are used to it already and overall both devices (io and mem) are > present in GENERIC You don't read support lists often enough, then :-) This comes up every day or two. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDXnSoWry0BWjoQKURAptgAKD4nzg1+66ytmdrXmV5dqFkSEtYRwCePnPs y43zEcUyW4/XONxSIpzoqb0= =CrFD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051025180840.GA48844>