Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:44:08 -0500 From: Will Maier <willmaier@ml1.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which version of FreeBSD a binary was compiled for? Message-ID: <20051027154408.GS29508@localdomain> In-Reply-To: <4360DB59.7010900@ywave.com> References: <cb5206420510251524r32ddd9adx7d4fdce8f82a85be@mail.gmail.com> <17247.39311.203645.265116@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <cb5206420510260818p664df038g39a1035c747ac315@mail.gmail.com> <200510262115.48144.krinklyfig@comcast.net> <cb5206420510270116k27ad6e13r5dd17dbc7323c01f@mail.gmail.com> <4360DB59.7010900@ywave.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 06:51:21AM -0700, Micah wrote:
> I have a 5.4 system, /do/ go into single user when upgrading, and
> file does /not/ report FreeBSD version. I get the same output you
> do. It would be nice to know why this works on some systems and
> not on others.
Consider diff'ing the /usr/share/misc/magic file from a system that
works and a system that doesn't work. I'd expect the difference to
be evident there.
It works find on all my machines, though.
--
o--------------------------{ Will Maier }--------------------------o
| jabber:..wcmaier@jabber.ccc.de | email:..........wcmaier@ml1.net |
| \.........wcmaier@cae.wisc.edu | \..........wcmaier@cae.wisc.edu |
*------------------[ BSD Unix: Live Free or Die ]------------------*
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051027154408.GS29508>