Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:40:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Russell Meek <russell@russellmeek.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release Message-ID: <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> References: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote: > Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server=20 > enviroment, production or non? >=20 > Pros? Cons? This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well to research the answer before asking :)=20 It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines with many CPUs (e.g. 12). Kris --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhSghWry0BWjoQKURAqW3AKDSfqLiRo3a3mCuGqT53S5skoyBFwCfQm3k i+DANzZAa9QsaXZSchIAi9A= =05Ed -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051124024033.GB13075>