Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:33:42 +0900 From: Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Standard way of updating 6.x ? Message-ID: <200602011133.53031.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200602010156.57750.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <bdf25fde0601310831qfda3239j8da895b74868e12@mail.gmail.com> <93676E29-4F0E-40DC-904C-225A859D0B78@u.washington.edu> <200602010156.57750.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:56、RW さんは書きました: > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 17:45, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Xn Nooby wrote: > > > > portupgrade: Use for updating your actual ports programs. > > > > There may be a more elegant solution though and I would be more than > > happy to hear it too :). > > -Garrett > > I find that portmanager generally does a better job at keeping ports up to > date without manual intervention. A notable example being its ability to > upgrade Gnome without the help of a script. I also found portupgrade both more capable in many cases and more easy-to-use (just portmanager -u to do what one "usually" wants to do). Too bad it was pulled from ports. -- Emails appear more personalised with signatures. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4B4QSMnO3Fce5JgRArJbAJ4iOCEudWmKRVwqpSgFXLbYsQOuGQCfezJO BXDQzAPhpcG6JqkBFSYqU0U= =qmG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602011133.53031.kjelderg>