Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:37:28 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_bridge.ko requires INET6... Message-ID: <200602021437.38385.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20060202124328.GK29980@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20060201005658.A70005@xorpc.icir.org> <20060202070149.GD18601@ip.net.ua> <20060202124328.GK29980@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:43, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > This needs to be fixed in pf then. > > Max Laier and I discussed this issue once, and Max had concern > over possible performance degradation that might result from > calling pflog functions through pointers to be set by a separate > pflog module. We can skip touching the pf module in RELENG_6 for > now and leave the issue to after 6.1-RELEASE is out. I have convinced myself that we should really use a function pointer here. I will try to commit a sollution to HEAD over the weekend. If you are MFC'ing the changes *now*, I'd appreciate if you could spare out pf, but I am willing to MFC the changes before 6.1 if testing goes well. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD4gsiXyyEoT62BG0RAtxYAJ4iynhq7KJOsBRl0CThhhbSHQyArQCcDWGe yb8rH/+YQgePenOwh/Xz9W0= =rcug -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602021437.38385.max>