Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 05:26:59 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <20060203102659.GA66445@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102603.C59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:14:27AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> writes: > > I have everything out-of-the-box - no special CFLAGS. > > The tinderbox uses -O2. It is possible that -O2 causes gcc to > generate code which is slightly larger (but also slightly faster) in > some cases. COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD4y/zWry0BWjoQKURAoIIAJ9qHtqStKkPZEQP9XZuSd6V2l6LZwCg3AcV fIQr/UVwhmkv51e+yxWAXeU= =dpdR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060203102659.GA66445>