Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:20:17 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <20060303082016.GA17730@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060302160958.GA2035@flame.pc> References: <20060302155625.37140.qmail@web32714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060302160958.GA2035@flame.pc>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-03-02 16:56, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: > > Hi; > > > > I'm not wanting to be rude or anything, but is the idea of > > moving to subversion at some point in time completely dead, or > > is csup going to interact with it somehow? > > ``Moving to Subversion'' is not really with us right now. On the > other hand, csup and CVS are with us today, and are ready to use. > I don't see why using or developing csup inhibits a potential > future move to Subversion, if that's what you are asking. I think that Robert Ollivier strongly suggested using mercurial as our (possibly) next vcs, so if any move from cvs then to mercurial..home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060303082016.GA17730>