Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:20:17 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <20060303082016.GA17730@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060302160958.GA2035@flame.pc> References: <20060302155625.37140.qmail@web32714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060302160958.GA2035@flame.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-03-02 16:56, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: > > Hi; > > > > I'm not wanting to be rude or anything, but is the idea of > > moving to subversion at some point in time completely dead, or > > is csup going to interact with it somehow? > > ``Moving to Subversion'' is not really with us right now. On the > other hand, csup and CVS are with us today, and are ready to use. > I don't see why using or developing csup inhibits a potential > future move to Subversion, if that's what you are asking. I think that Robert Ollivier strongly suggested using mercurial as our (possibly) next vcs, so if any move from cvs then to mercurial..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060303082016.GA17730>