Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:46:24 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: rakhesh@rakhesh.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-BETA 4 stable for normal use? Message-ID: <20060322084624.GA94483@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060322050432.7801.qmail@web54512.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060322050432.7801.qmail@web54512.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:04:32PM -0800, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'd like to try out FreeBSD and was wondering whether > I should start with 6.1-BETA4 or 6.0? Its just for > home use anyways, more as a way to fool around with > FreeBSD a bit, so was wondering if 6.1-BETA4 would > suffice for the purpose ... is it stable enough or > would it give me issues?=20 Yes, it's quite stable and has many fewer bugs than 6.0. Kris --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEIQ7fWry0BWjoQKURAj1CAJwPOioqxUzVRVf94MYSIiVSNSQhfwCfQ3Hf GaMd37pzAsnO46/C+pYMtPA= =gEC6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060322084624.GA94483>