Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:38:11 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Subject: Re: In-kernel NAT (was Re: interesting(?) data on network interrupt servicing) Message-ID: <20060323183701.G46757@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20060323064259.A67264@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20060322122906.A41691@xorpc.icir.org> <20060323143921.GM37096@over-yonder.net> <20060323064259.A67264@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, 06:42-0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:39:21AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 12:29:06PM -0800 I heard the voice of > > Luigi Rizzo, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > > > Paolo Pisati (SoC work on in-kernel natd) > > > > Speaking of, are there plans to get this into -CURRENT sometime? I'd > > love to be able to do my NAT'ing in ipfw (and, from the looks of it, > > be able to add/change port forwardings without blowing away all the > > current NAT state, which would be _really_ nice). > > i wish i could find the time to test and port it, but don't think > it will happen soon, i am afraid :( I was under inpression Gleb had (semi)-worked version of ng_natd. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060323183701.G46757>