Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:37:45 -0800
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rc.subr / rc.d/sshd patch for review
Message-ID:  <20060327183745.GA19473@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1143461191.4290.5.camel@mayday.esat.net>
References:  <1143202549.16053.145.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20060324205627.GA18100@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <00E087F1-81E4-4580-A655-50F3DD8A471F@xbsd.org> <1143461191.4290.5.camel@mayday.esat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:06:30PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 11:06 +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >=20
> > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:15:49PM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > >> This is based on Oliver's patch for rc.d/sshd that can be found in
> > >> Gnats.
> > >>
> > >> In load_rc_config, I'm extracting prefix from ${command} (or
> > >> ${name}_program, which part is moved from run_rc_command), and =20
> > >> setting
> > >> etcdir accordingly.
> > >>
> > >> The point is that some scripts (like rc.d/sshd) can be used for base
> > >> sshd as well as ports sshd, and makes possible to source
> > >> ${prefix}/etc/rc.conf.d/${name}.
> > >>
> > >> This patch also documents ${name}_program above run_rc_command =20
> > >> (though
> > >> it's actually used in load_rc_config).
> > >
> > > Is command always set?  I'm pretty sure it isn't so this may not be =
=20
> > > entierly
> > > safe.  If it's not set, should we try to guess prefix from $0?
> >=20
> > Somehow, command gets set to the right value, but you're right, I'm =20
> > missing a bit here.
>=20
> Hum, re-reading rc.subr, you were right, so I just did what you
> supposed.

Thinking about this a bit more, in the guessing frmo $0 case, your proposed
code:

+		prefix=3D${0%/etc/rc.d/*}/

won't work reliably when the user uses a relative path. I think something
like this would be better:

		_tmp=3D`/bin/realpath $0`
		prefix=3D${_tmp%/etc/rc.d/*}/

> > > The other issue I see is that instead of:
> > >
> > > 	if [ -f ${etcdir}/rc.conf.d/"$_command" ]; then
> > > 		debug "Sourcing ${etcdir}/rc.conf.d/${_command}"
> > > 		. ${etcdir}/rc.conf.d/"$_command"
> > > 	fi
> > >
> > > I think we should do:
> > >
> > > 	if [ -f /etc/rc.conf.d/"$_command" ]; then
> > > 		debug "Sourcing /etc/rc.conf.d/${_command}"
> > > 		. /etc/rc.conf.d/"$_command"
> > > 	fi
> > > 	if [ "${etcdir}" !=3D "/etc" -a -f ${etcdir}/=20
> > > rc.conf.d/"$_command" ]; then
> > > 		debug "Sourcing ${etcdir}/rc.conf.d/${_command}"
> > > 		. ${etcdir}/rc.conf.d/"$_command"
> > > 	fi
> > >
> > > That preserves the old behavior while adding support for
> > > ${prefix}/etc/rc.conf.d.
> >=20
> > Fair enough, but I'd like to add a note saying that /etc/rc.conf.d/$=20
> > {name} is deprecated for ${etcdir} !=3D "/etc".

The deprecation warning should not be printed in the case that ${etcdir}
is /etc.  You should also avoid sourcing the file twice in the /etc
case.  The easiest way to do that is probably to make the first case
contingent on ${etcdir} !=3D /etc.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEKDD4XY6L6fI4GtQRApZmAKDQJkO8hiZiplUSlA9koyHAhfyPMACdHh0a
AANCTUi1bHKNtdbvj4ZOTVc=
=RldB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060327183745.GA19473>