Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:10:42 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        bms@spc.org
Cc:        mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers.102a7e@mired.org, scottl@samsco.org, ceri@submonkey.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Using any network interface whatsoever
Message-ID:  <20060410.141042.25162164.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060410194746.GY80492@spc.org>
References:  <20060409090757.GW80492@spc.org> <20060409.184825.99254285.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060410194746.GY80492@spc.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20060410194746.GY80492@spc.org>
            Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> writes:
: On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:48:25PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > I though thtis was already supported.  We export bus/slot/function
: > information devd, which can be used to configure the device.
: 
: If I've read the specs or code incorrectly please do let me know --
: my reading here is based on the PCI code as I understand it to be.
: 
: As I understand things, the bus/slot/function numbers in pci(9), the
: *slot* number isn't guaranteed to have any meaning in geographic reality;
: it's purely what the PCI logic thinks the bus topology looks like and
: hence what the device numbers are. See BUGS in pci(9).

The device number is fixed for a given mother board slot.  It will
never change unless you change the mother board.

However, for stacking topologies the slot is the position in the stack.

: It won't tell you that a given card is in a given slot with any degree
: of certainty or consistency across the range of backplanes available
: from multiple vendors -- although people may like to give PICMG a try
: as I hear such boards are consistent about such things.

Correct.

: In the old Microsoft-specified $PIR tables there was a column which
: allowed you to map the bus/device/function tuple we use to a physical
: slot number, but this only ran 1-6. With multiple PCI buses and slot
: types, as well as multifunction devices, this information quickly became
: unusable and unreliable, although src/tools/tools/pirtool will happily
: display this information.

Correct.

: ACPI as you no doubt know does away with the $PIR tables, although many
: BIOS still export them to allow legacy DOS programs which use PCI to work.
: There is an extension to ACPI which adds geographical slot addressing
: to the device tree but I haven't seen any systems which support it.

OK.  Physical slot information.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060410.141042.25162164.imp>