Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:46:03 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk Message-ID: <20060425234603.eba09894.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <444E96A1.3010307@rogers.com> References: <20060424181531.GA13774@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425001751.S44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424202859.GA18457@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425004405.G44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424205026.GA18844@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425134418.J57625@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060425080932.1rv9hq0rcws4wc84@www.wolves.k12.mo.us> <20060425162656.GC54244@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425213313.R71240@woozle.rinet.ru> <444E8E48.8040008@rogers.com> <20060425211417.GA58948@xor.obsecurity.org> <444E96A1.3010307@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:37:37 -0400 Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> wrote: > Indeed, but the developers should also realize that a lot of users > have servers in production and can not afford the downtime, or simply > don't have the resources to test. I think the developers should also > spend a little more time doing more extensive testing of their own > code. It could also be viewed as irresponsible to have servers in production _without_ a corresponding test system to test proposed changes on. Just my 0.02$ -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060425234603.eba09894.torfinn.ingolfsen>