Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:18:13 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody? Message-ID: <20060502171813.GA7296@roadrunner.q.local>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Good day,
since the ipw(4) driver can't do WPA, I wanted to give ndis(4) a try.
This *used* to work back on 5.3 (memory is a bit vague) but it ain't
happening on 6.1-RC.
I'm using the same driver as last time, which is the version 1.2.2.8
from Intel. I also downloaded the newest one, version 1.2.4.35, but none
of them attach, when loading the if_ndis module.
/sys/modules/if_ndis# make clean
/sys/modules/if_ndis# ndiscvt -i /compat/ndis/w70n51.inf -s /compat/ndis/w70n51.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h
/sys/modules/if_ndis# make
/sys/modules/if_ndis# make install load
/sbin/kldload -v /vol/obj/usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/if_ndis.ko
Loaded /vol/obj/usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/if_ndis.ko, id=32
pci2: <network> at device 3.0 (no driver attached)
none1@pci2:3:0: class=0x028000 card=0x25618086 chip=0x10438086 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2100 LAN Card Driver'
class = network
I know this did work in the past. What are other peoples experiences?
Besides, does ndis(4) even do WPA? If not then I would have to buy new
hardware anyway and the whole exercise would be in vain.
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome!
Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
Don't know. Don't care.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEV5RV524iJyD+6d0RAvb+AJ9tp/abnN24yF5ZqNbC7K0HztIQXACgt2Vw
FKKobShXMM0WcvFCZbUN0TI=
=GZeR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060502171813.GA7296>