Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:59:06 +0300 From: mykola.stryebkov@gmail.com To: Intron <mag@intron.ac> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VM question related to faults Message-ID: <20060731085906.GA869@taran.infoua.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <courier.44CD9F44.00017212@intron.ac> References: <20060730105731.GA64955@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20060730200354.GA82547@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <courier.44CD9F44.00017212@intron.ac>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31.07.2006 14:12:20, Intron wrote: > Mutex(9) is sometimes too heavy, and has many limitations, while sx(9) > is somewhat enough. First paragraph from sx(9) manual says: Shared/exclusive locks are used to protect data that are read far more often than they are written. Mutexes are inherently more efficient than shared/exclusive locks, so shared/exclusive locks should be used prudently. -- Nick Strebkov Public key: http://humgat.org/~nick/pubkey.txt fpr: 552C 88D6 895B 6E64 F277 D367 8A70 8132 47F5 C1B6
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060731085906.GA869>