Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:42:55 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Where is thr_getscheduler Message-ID: <20060802144255.GU69505@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20060801213803.GB9583@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20060801204501.GA19647@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0608011657040.1810@sea.ntplx.net> <20060801211657.GA29737@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060801212742.GB13841@heff.fud.org.nz> <20060801213803.GB9583@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:38:03PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Steve Kargl, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> If UPDATING had a proper notice,
If UPDATING had a notice every time a {library,program} in 7 did
something that wasn't supported by 6 (for various values of 7 and 6),
it would be a very, very long and very boring file.
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060802144255.GU69505>