Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:09 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: "Todorov @ Paladin" <todorov@paladin.bulgarpress.com> Cc: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade Message-ID: <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1060823010930.9072A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <F55D8A99-A30E-49DB-94F3-8A1737CF7556@khera.org> <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: > Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of > previously chosen options for a port build? >=20 It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are makefile options specified in pkgtools.conf, they are only taken into accont if the port is (re)build explicitly; they are not taken into account if a port is (re)built as a dependency of another port. In plain text: if port B has options in pkgtools.conf, and port A has B as its dependency, and you portinstall/portupgrade A, B will be built (if needs be) without pkgtools.conf options. Be careful. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7K11qRfpzJluFF4RAmX1AJ9KtZT8OHYim8B/7PELDle+92bBFwCfaIMj GiLmqc1EIjl+rh8JjXX1w44= =cwIy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060823193309.GA77890>