Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:27:32 -0400 From: "Charles M. Hannum" <mycroft@MIT.EDU> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org>, "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>, misc@openbsd.org, Harpalus a Como <harpalus.como@gmail.com>, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>, netbsd-users@netbsd.org, miros-discuss@mirbsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of NetBSD Message-ID: <20060901152732.GR10101@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060831230813.GA28455@petunia.outback.escape.de> References: <20060830232723.GU10101@multics.mit.edu> <98f5a8830608301731s2b0663e3g94b0bd32f8a06a78@mail.gmail.com> <c6d37fe0608310259k12fe629eve59e59042fcfdb4c@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0608311312190.8977@odem.66h.42h.de> <950621ad0608310654h78ae0023g346abd108815ae72@mail.gmail.com> <20060831110112.J82634@hub.org> <f34ca13c0608310843p4e28b57eoec2f60737c034ddb@mail.gmail.com> <20060831184715.B82634@hub.org> <20060831230813.GA28455@petunia.outback.escape.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:08:13AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > They don't have to write device drivers at all, they just should > write good documentation. Unfortunately, the "documentation" often isn't so hot either. I'll give you an example. Even with both code and "documentation" from Realtek, we still had to reverse engineer how some parts of the RTL8180 work. And though it works now, our understanding is still incomplete. It is far easier for a manufacturer to spew out a Windows driver in-house, where they have direct access to the people who designed the hardware, so this is what they do. The Windows driver model is pretty much designed around this approach. What we really want is not just documentation, but support from their engineers. The Linux community is starting to get this in some places.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060901152732.GR10101>