Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:19:14 -0500 From: Mike Horwath <drechsau@Geeks.ORG> To: Danial Thom <danial_thom@yahoo.com> Cc: NOC Prowip <tec@mega.net.br>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Mike Horwath <drechsau@Geeks.ORG> Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x Message-ID: <20061014211914.GA79862@Geeks.ORG> In-Reply-To: <20061014203002.36248.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061014153813.GC72440@Geeks.ORG> <20061014203002.36248.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:30:02PM -0700, Danial Thom wrote: > You should try the new 10K WD drives (the ones that just came > out). They kick butt. Unfortunately, I'd have to use FreeBSD 6 to > use them, so I have to stick with SCSI on 4.x to get maximum > performance. You are so completely wrong. The 10K WD disks are fully usuable under FreeBSD 4.x. In fact, I have more than 8 systems doing such, using 10K WD Raptor drives and FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE. Where do people come up with these statements? -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061014211914.GA79862>