Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:13:41 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: nfe: can not cvs sources anymore! Message-ID: <20061119201341.GA1381@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4560A1A5.4050500@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4560657A.9000002@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20061119161749.GB31926@rambler-co.ru> <4560A1A5.4050500@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 07:25:41PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 03:08:58PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > =20 > >> Hello. > >> Using these two sources for getting nfe() driver support for my FreeBSD > >> 6.2-BETA/AMD64 box was pretty convenient in the past weeks due to my b= ig > >> interrupt problems using the nve() driver. > >> But with yesterday, I can't get the sources anymore. nfe() isn't yet a > >> part of the 6.2 BETA, that's what I looked first for, so can anybody > >> help me out? Is nfe() a part of 6.2-REL in the near future or are there > >> other reasons stop spreading the sources via that cvs source? > >> > >> Thanks for your help in advance, > >> > >> =20 > > Did you try the version at > > http://www.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki/software/freebsd-nfe.html > > ? I use it and except for some peer-to-peer gigabit problems I > > didn't notice any other bad signs. It's far more stable that > > what we have now in the CVS tree. > > > > > > Cheers, > > =20 > Thank you for the link. > No, I did not try this link since I thought the CVS tree's version was > the stabelst version we have. I find it convenient by pushing it via net > using cvs just after I upgraded my CVS tree of the sources for the > operating system. I will keep this link in mind. > Is there a date we can this driver expect in FreeBSD 6.2? Or is the > driver more subject to be merged in 6.2-STABLE and for 6.3? nve() isn't > suitable, neither with SCHED_ULE (which I use now again) and with > SCHED_4BSD, because on my hardware platform the interrupt generation is > much higher than that of the nfe() driver - and due to this massive > interrupts useless for me. Please remember to turn off SCHED_ULE before submitting any and all future bug reports, thanks :-) Kris --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYLr0Wry0BWjoQKURAjn8AJ4mLUtikB73uWl54WxBg23cHagBQwCff6Lb io0ZFds0i4mIlen/uv8NpXo= =cPL3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061119201341.GA1381>