Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:11:42 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: mjacob@FreeBSD.org Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: a code reduction function addition to cam_xpt Message-ID: <20061205140644.Q28464@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20061204150922.F18492@ns1.feral.com> References: <20061119161631.L44297@ns1.feral.com> <3bbf2fe10611191631h6883b862uf8088533913a7bc6@mail.gmail.com> <20061120221153.GA5155@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <3bbf2fe10611201418m15d50703m37d9d5620e5c832d@mail.gmail.com> <20061204150922.F18492@ns1.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 mjacob@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Was there ever a consensus about this to the point of: > > a) Yes, this is a nice thing to have > b) Should it be a define or a function? > > I obviously think yes for #a. I lean toward a function. Comments? I wouldn't have thought of using a macro except for an entry in IOCCC. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061205140644.Q28464>