Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:46:35 -0800 (PST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE 2.0 Message-ID: <20070105154450.Y586@10.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <459DB871.1050109@freebsd.org> References: <20070104005625.D1508@10.0.0.1> <459CCBA1.40305@freebsd.org> <b1fa29170701041131o287ee0cflda63eae9528f68dc@mail.gmail.com> <200701050749.49058.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20070104155755.Y552@10.0.0.1> <20070104163449.D552@10.0.0.1> <459DB871.1050109@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, David Xu wrote: > >> Anyway, thanks for the pointer Xu. I may hack this up and compare it to >> ULE's current balancing. > > Yesterday, I have tested super-smack benchmark on 2-cpu machine, ULE > decreased performance about 40%, this might be a regression though. I just fixed a regression in the load balancer. On my 8way opteron ULE is now 22% faster than 4BSD for select-key.smack with 32 threads. This is for both KSE and libthr. libthr is of course significantly faster overall. I believe I can improve this even more by borrowing some tricks from solaris. Jeff > >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff >> > > Regards, > David Xu > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070105154450.Y586>