Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:29:47 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:08:20AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>>> How does that compare to 6.2-RELEASE performance? > >>>> > >>> Much better. Fixing filedesc locking was key. > >>> > >>> > >> If there is extra cycles on the same hardware, a performance comparison > >> graph would be great. > > > > See the links in my posting ;) > > I think he means graphs between 6-stable and 7-current - it would be > very nice to see those on the same machine, mysql configuration, etc. > (at the very least to clearly show why people should upgrade :) ). 6.2 and 7.0 CVS sources (which are graphed on Jeff's blog and my webpage linked there) are unlikely to differ much: as I said, filedesc locking was key to fixing performance here. I'm sure we'll be promoting this improvement heavily when 7.0 enters release cycle, to encourage people to consider upgrading. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070225092947.GA49489>