Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:53:28 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something wrong with Linux on 6.2-stable/amd64 Message-ID: <200707200853.28425@aldan> In-Reply-To: <20070720144529.63aa21d3@deskjail> References: <200707192341.59940@aldan> <200707200800.19941@aldan> <20070720144529.63aa21d3@deskjail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On п'ятниця 20 липень 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote: = Temporary deinstall linux_base-fc4, install the linux_kdump port, = deinstall the linux_base-gentoo port (only a build dependency) and = reinstall the linux_base-fc4 port again. You funny... = > and I can't use your i386 package on amd64, or can I?.. = = You can use the i386 binary, but it is not able to decode the 64bit = fields in the ktrace (there may be some if you trace more than the = linux stuff). The package you host on your site is for -current. Fortunately, there is a cluster-built one ftp.freebsd.org. All the syscalls, that were shown as `old.hostname' by the native kdump, are now shown as: 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 53113 civctp CALL linux_select(0,0,0,0,0xff7ffc30) 53113 civctp RET linux_select 0 Not sure, if this helps or not... Probably, not, because, as I said, the syscalls aren't frequent enough to even saturate the xterm. Most of the CPU time appears to be spent by the program itself. -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200707200853.28425>