Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:50:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> To: Alexander@leidinger.net (Alexander Leidinger) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, dan@danneh.org Subject: Re: nfe(4) issues Message-ID: <200708090850.l798oJfL089684@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <20070809092710.papk9jozk0kswgcg@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Tony Holmes wrote: > > Let me add a "I concur" to this. I upgaded to 7-current 4 weeks ago > > for this very reason and I have been pleased with the stability and > > performance. I have enough confidence to deploy into production in > > the next couple of weeks. > > gcc 4.2.0 in -current has known defects. Yes, I know, that's why the default optimization setting in 7-current has been changed from -O2 to -O1 recently, until gcc 4.2.1 is in the tree. With -O1 I haven't encountered any problems so far ... Of course that doesn't mean there aren't any problems. But I'm actually very confident right now. :-) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "And believe me, as a C++ programmer, I don't hesitate to question the decisions of language designers. After a decent amount of C++ exposure, Python's flaws seem ridiculously small." -- Ville Vainio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708090850.l798oJfL089684>