Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:19:32 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: SCHED_ULE on desktop system Message-ID: <20070916061932.GA93480@underworld.novel.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I'm curious if SCHED_ULE is designed to be used on a desktop system. I'm running -CURRENT at home and tried to use SCHED_ULE for some time. It works alright while the load is not very high. But once I start compiling something (running 'make buildworld' or 'portupgrade -a' for example), the machine comes almost unusable - X11's windows takes a lot of time to redraw, changing virtual desktop in window manager may take a several seconds. And it's nearly impossible to watch some movie with mplayer.=20 However, when I switch to SCHED_4BSD, system's reaction time gets lower and I even can watch a movie with mplayer when compiling something. Is SHCED_ULE designed to behave that way or I spotted some bug? PS I run UP system. Roman Bogorodskiy --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBRuzK9IB0WzgdqspGAQIQygP/Q3JMylxBMirU8PRsPDs1Em4tF/s74Set p5yBTtcn2xtUuNSKfCVChuw9wrjWv9NkN5p4JoBI7nGJmjUvoudYaRJGtK1jLjcy 5bR4NOURlDX8JgYQLIjxAjitML4t4N582WBR9Gp3xjC5dn05s3KpVjllSikDpVDo GEi90L0XJWE= =H3OT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070916061932.GA93480>