Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:47:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> Cc: josh.carroll@gmail.com, Maxim Khitrov <mkhitrov@gmail.com>, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a new workstation - dual or quad-core CPU for FreeBSD 7? Message-ID: <20070917084559.K71196@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <46EC4F59.7070104@FreeBSD.org> References: <26ddd1750709141351i3646e9bdg8d8b7e93461167f9@mail.gmail.com> <bef9a7920709141441r5c228a8bu1fcf2ea15868c3c@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750709151014x2112b022r9bcb999fbf1e7e49@mail.gmail.com> <46EC270A.3020100@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151421h7bfdeb6fo7dc671820294e9c7@mail.gmail.com> <46EC4F59.7070104@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes, 4BSD is still the default, although you definitely want to use ULE for > performance reasons (NB: only on 7, dont use ULE on 6). I don't know whether > the release engineers plan to change that default, but I will check. could you point to some URL/explain what's the actual difference.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070917084559.K71196>