Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:21:41 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Fluffles <etc@fluffles.net>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Writing contigiously to UFS2? Message-ID: <20070922021201.C43374@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <46F3B4B0.40606@freebsd.org> References: <46F3A64C.4090507@fluffles.net> <46F3B4B0.40606@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Eric Anderson wrote: > I recommend trying msdos fs. On recent -CURRENT, it should perform fairly > well (akin to UFS2 I think), and if I recall correctly, has a more contiguous > block layout. It can give perfect contiguity for data blocks, but has serious slowness for non-sequential access to large files, and anyway "large" for msdosfs is only 4GB. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070922021201.C43374>