Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:59:21 +0000 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with GUI configs Message-ID: <20071112235921.11ae8c0a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <4738CB99.5000807@web.de> References: <2852884D-270A-4879-B960-C10A602E080E@ashleymoran.me.uk> <47387891.2060007@unsane.co.uk> <47387BCA.6080604@foster.cc> <20071112183502.438b44b8@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4738A71A.6060100@chuckr.org> <4738ACDD.50108@u.washington.edu> <4738ADC8.2060005@gmx.de> <4738AEBF.4010109@u.washington.edu> <4738C145.2050601@chuckr.org> <20071112214240.5d3b048a@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4738CB99.5000807@web.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:54:33 +0100
Tino Engel <elrap@web.de> wrote:
> RW schrieb:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:10:29 -0500
> > Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I hope not. We really need to move this out of being a ports
> >> buildtime thing. Currently, to build ports in batch either
> >> requires someone to be chained to the computer, so as to intercept
> >> all those screens, or to simply agree to install everything, with
> >> no inpput whatever.
> >>
> >
> > That's not correct, you can run make config-conditional or make
> > config-recursive anytime you like.
> >
> >
> But not on a portupgrade... I don't want to run config-recursive on
> the whole ports tree though....
It's not hard to script it though, something like the following would do
#!/bin/sh
for p in `pkg_version -ol'<' |awk '{ print $1 }'`; do
cd /usr/ports/${p} && make config-recursive
done
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071112235921.11ae8c0a>