Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:28:30 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful. Message-ID: <20071216232830.GD5874@piglet.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20071214033333.GA3455@kobe.laptop> References: <20071214010542.GA19553@demeter.hydra> <20071214022529.GA2571@kobe.laptop> <4761F17F.9030908@chuckr.org> <20071214033333.GA3455@kobe.laptop>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 14/12/07 Giorgos Keramidas said: > Tcsh is a fine shell. I'm using it all the time (that's how I found out > that a buglet reported by Kris Kennaway a few months ago was indeed a > bug which I could reproduce too). I always found csh/tcsh aliases annoying, since there are no shell functions. I also found the shell redirection awkward. It's ok otherwise, but I've since become addicted to bash. Mind you, I'm sure some tcsh users could point out some features that bash doesn't have. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHZbSeKGqCc1vIvggRApfRAJ0bFX9yu9XX98dK0/DdtRHhNYX7VwCgtNE8 4g/5ql+h5/x6f2iDI1wJZBg= =lSvx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071216232830.GD5874>