Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:54:36 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OSS Virtualization options ... Message-ID: <20071220215436.0c596cb5@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <20071220184322.5ad659d4@meijome.net> References: <74F0F91EA046A1B9EAB79AF7@ganymede.hub.org> <20071220184322.5ad659d4@meijome.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:43:22 +1100
Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> wrote:
> wrt to QEMU,i don't think is fast enough to make it worth it - i think you'd gain more by moving a bit to the side of freebsd for the host and using other options (linux+ Vmware + freebsd as guest)
I meant this in the context of using QEMU to run multiple simultaneous VMs for server virtualisation. I think it works OK(ish) for , say, running Windows on your bsd box....but i don't think you can compare it to something like Xen or VMWare or MS Virtual Server
probably a bit behind Qemu in speed would be BOCHS, though I think it is a bit more flexible wrt to the machines emulated.
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
I sense much NT in you.
NT leads to Bluescreen.
Bluescreen leads to downtime.
Downtime leads to suffering.
NT is the path to the darkside.
Powerful Unix is.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071220215436.0c596cb5>