Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:01:26 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Gerrit K?hn <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken re(4) Message-ID: <20080612070126.GF7250@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20080612085810.072d705d.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> References: <20080527165232.2acbb00f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <3C916EEA-5A2B-4C88-B834-0F47D7D525FA@gmail.com> <20080611092457.82c83083.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20080612032228.GD7250@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080612085810.072d705d.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:58:10AM +0200, Gerrit K?hn wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote > about Re: broken re(4): > > PY> Before checking performance of network controller you had to rule > PY> out other factors like disk I/O. Use one of benchmark programs in > PY> ports/benchmark. > > I already did simple benchmarking by using "dd if=/dev/zero of=file" which > gave me several 10s of MByte/s under all circumstances. > Can you recommend one of the benchmarking programs for more detailed > testing? > Try netperf or iperf in ports/benchmark. > > cu > Gerrit -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080612070126.GF7250>