Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 07:35:01 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Sverre Svenningsen <ss.alert@online.no> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: may I commit this small umodem patch ? Message-ID: <20080705213500.GC29380@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <C352D7E1-9ADD-44CB-88E8-4347FC727EE3@online.no> References: <20080703140719.GA72315@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080703170700.3b91b8c6@peedub.jennejohn.org> <20080703152551.GA73103@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <200807042333.17859.hselasky@c2i.net> <20080704213959.GA1706@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <a276da400807041750q7aa04d7va5844d7197230b1a@mail.gmail.com> <C352D7E1-9ADD-44CB-88E8-4347FC727EE3@online.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--rQ7Ovc9/RBrrr0/1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Jul-05 09:24:15 +0200, Sverre Svenningsen <ss.alert@online.no> wrot= e: >Is current@freebsd.org just an alias to freebsd-current@freebsd.org ? Yes. There are some MUAs that have broken list-handling functionality and cannot be configured to recognize list aliases. Unless the sender manually strips out the redundant address, it will wind up duplicated. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --rQ7Ovc9/RBrrr0/1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhv6QQACgkQ/opHv/APuIe32QCfafPlba5fkYbrci+tIAAiMld/ NGAAn1SmUkwKsOe9LfLrmXp+i59SrY6Q =KTMH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rQ7Ovc9/RBrrr0/1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080705213500.GC29380>