Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:23:57 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: jhb@FreeBSD.org Cc: net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Code review Message-ID: <20080826.012357.1973601375.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200808251037.11126.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20080825.002316.-1548243307.imp@bsdimp.com> <200808251037.11126.jhb@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <200808251037.11126.jhb@freebsd.org>
John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Monday 25 August 2008 02:23:16 am M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > I did this a few years ago when trying to track down a problem with
: > some realtek network chips that I was having problems with at Timing
: > Solutions. I'd like to get this into the tree, since it was helpful
: > then.
: >
: > Comments?
:
: When you are running a faster tick I think want to only call the mii and
: watchdog stuff once a second still. I know this will break the tx watchdog
: for example. Since it's kind of tricky to manage that I think you should
: just use a separate timer for the twister stuff.
Is this in general, or do you have a specific problem in mind with the
rl change? In general, we're not transmitting during this exercise
and it happens only once... Is it worth the extra hair?
Warner
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080826.012357.1973601375.imp>