Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:35:17 +0100 From: Uwe Laverenz <uwe@laverenz.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors Message-ID: <20081207193517.GA20905@laverenz.de> In-Reply-To: <20081207191727.V1610@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4be2da2e0812062344y26eddcc9sf589531d10c71a1c@mail.gmail.com> <20081207093713.O5433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081207082932.04a7cf16@scorpio> <11167f520812070853i3b6fa6dei6e5c71669416470@mail.gmail.com> <20081207191727.V1610@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 07:18:08PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > most freebsd users don't need 3D at all, or don't need super-high-speed > 3D. Who is "most freebsd users"? I agree that there are more important things to worry about than nvidia/amd64 support, but: if you want to buy a computer these days and want to use it as a desktop/workstation with our favourite operating system, you have a serious problem to find a graphics card that is both useable and buyable. > so simply don't use nvidia/ati Ok, what else then? Uwe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081207193517.GA20905>