Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:56:14 -0700
From:      Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
Message-ID:  <20081212205614.GB37185@kokopelli.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <18754.48923.616173.319215@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
References:  <20081207193517.GA20905@laverenz.de> <20081211170011.777236f8@gom.home> <20081212015814.GB32982@kokopelli.hydra> <200812112345.20572.perlcat@alltel.net> <20081212174607.GC36348@kokopelli.hydra> <4942B6A3.504@gmail.com> <18754.48923.616173.319215@jerusalem.litteratus.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:44:27PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
> michael writes:
> 
> >  why don't we all just say it. freebsd sucks because it isn't cp/m.
> 
> 	CP/?  Poser.  I want my TWENEX back.
> 	:-)

What do you have against ITS?

-- 
Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Quoth Paul Graham: "Real ugliness is not harsh-looking syntax, but
having to build programs out of the wrong concepts."

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAklCz+4ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWv5gCfU947IbwbH2YcXDZEEM0HE7Tt
u5QAnA2JKhwHfzzQ9SC36eI9aMOzWBQT
=ZpEY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081212205614.GB37185>