Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:56:14 -0700 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors Message-ID: <20081212205614.GB37185@kokopelli.hydra> In-Reply-To: <18754.48923.616173.319215@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20081207193517.GA20905@laverenz.de> <20081211170011.777236f8@gom.home> <20081212015814.GB32982@kokopelli.hydra> <200812112345.20572.perlcat@alltel.net> <20081212174607.GC36348@kokopelli.hydra> <4942B6A3.504@gmail.com> <18754.48923.616173.319215@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:44:27PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > michael writes: >=20 > > why don't we all just say it. freebsd sucks because it isn't cp/m. >=20 > CP/? Poser. I want my TWENEX back. > :-) What do you have against ITS? --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Paul Graham: "Real ugliness is not harsh-looking syntax, but having to build programs out of the wrong concepts." --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklCz+4ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWv5gCfU947IbwbH2YcXDZEEM0HE7Tt u5QAnA2JKhwHfzzQ9SC36eI9aMOzWBQT =ZpEY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081212205614.GB37185>