Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:24:28 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using HDD's for ZFS: 'desktop' vs 'raid / enterprise' -edition drives? Message-ID: <20090102222428.e06eddac.dick@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090102201730.GC22308@teddy.fas.com> References: <495E17AD.30707@isafeelin.org> <20090102160727.A38841@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <867i5dsoll.fsf@srvbsdnanssv.interne.kisoft-services.com> <20090102174809.B39293@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090102201730.GC22308@teddy.fas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:17:30 -0500 stan <stanb@panix.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:48:27PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > > >>think twice before doing. > > > > > >Could you elaborate please ? > > > > ZFS still doesn't work as described ... > > Is that comment FreeBSD specifc, or aimed at ZFS in general? Mind you, ZFS on FreeBSD is not the same as on OpenSolaris-2008.11, Nevada or even Solaris 10. On those platforms ZFS generally does what it is supposed to do, other than it's still a developing FS. On *BSD related systems that is not always the case. Do a good readup. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce snv104 ++ + All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090102222428.e06eddac.dick>