Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:38:29 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/136945: [ufs] [lor] filedesc structure/ufs (poll) Message-ID: <200907281038.30277.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <e890cae60907280703v3cefb770j325876ab15030bcc@mail.gmail.com> References: <200907271400.n6RE05Rv056472@freefall.freebsd.org> <200907280941.32840.jhb@freebsd.org> <e890cae60907280703v3cefb770j325876ab15030bcc@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 10:03:40 am Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/7/28 John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>: > > On Monday 27 July 2009 10:00:05 am Rene Ladan wrote: > >> The following reply was made to PR kern/136945; it has been noted by GNATS. > >> > >> From: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> > >> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> > >> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org > >> Subject: Re: kern/136945: [ufs] [lor] filedesc structure/ufs (poll) > >> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:51:15 +0200 > >> > >> 2009/7/27 John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>: > >> > I would actually expect this to be the correct order for these two > > locks.= > >> =A0Can > >> > you capture the output of the 'debug.witness.fullgraph' sysctl to a file? > >> > > >> Yes, see attachment. I'm still running the same 8.0-BETA2. > > > > Hmm, the attachment was eaten by a grue, can you post the file somewhere? > > > Yes, see ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/kern_136945.txt Ok, it looks like it did encounter a UFS -> filedesc order at some point. Can you patch sys/kern/subr_witness.c to add a section to the order_lists[] array after the 'ZFS locking list' and before the spin locks list that looks like this: { "filedesc structure", &lock_class_sx }, { "ufs", &lock_class_lockmgr}, { NULL, NULL }, -- John Baldwinhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200907281038.30277.jhb>