Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:17:53 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel-lucent.com.au> To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you still want CTM? Message-ID: <20090804031753.GP98247@pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <4A77A0EE.3060602@missouri.edu> References: <4A77A0EE.3060602@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2009-Aug-03 21:46:06 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.e= du> wrote: >My question is this - are there people who still depend on CTM for their= =20 >updates? Or is it time to close down CTM? Or is there someone else who= =20 >wants to take it over? I don't have CVSup access at work and currently rely on CTM delta emails. I also use CTM (via FTP) at home because that was easy to setup and means my trees at home and work are synchronised. I could switch to CVSup at home without too much hassle but loss of CTM would be a serious hassle at work - the easiest solution would probably be for me to setup something fairly similar to a CTM server at home and mail it to work. As for formally taking over CTM, I don't think I'm in a position to do so but would appreciate some more details: - How much disk space is required? - How resource intensive is building the deltas? If it's a dedicated box, what CPU/RAM does it have? - What are the bandwidth requirements? - How are the deltas forwarded out to the mail and FTP servers? --=20 Peter Jeremy --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkp3qGEACgkQ/opHv/APuIdvgACgj0bPnSMxOiycArX84cb87GSD XjkAn0uHEGelhQr2sUj3nXwR7s3njM15 =D0t8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090804031753.GP98247>