Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:54:26 -0800 From: Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel designations terminology confusion -- amd64 used for into quad core Message-ID: <200908050654.26375.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <20090805132755.GA21963@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> References: <200908051414.49468.david@vizion2000.net> <20090805132755.GA21963@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote: > The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented and > created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD named > the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too. Later Intel > also started using it (while using their own name(s) for it), but FreeBSD > has stuck with the name amd64. This isn't completely correct. There is actually an ia64 architecture, before Intel was ready to give up the "who dictates the PC 64bit architecture" battle. There's a handful of CPU's who use that instruction set, but later Intel switched to supporting AMD's instruction set and thus the PC 64 bit architecture now is amd64. It'll be fun to see people asking in a few years why Oracle processors are called "sparc64"... -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200908050654.26375.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions>