Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:48:47 +0200 From: "Robert Eckardt" <rol@robert-eckardt.de> To: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> Subject: Re: Fw: Re: ZFS continuously growing [SOLVED] Message-ID: <20090903094501.M34547@robert-eckardt.de> In-Reply-To: <d36406630909030201l36be8f6em4296f7b24306ee57@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090902193059.M336@Robert-Eckardt.de> <78cb3d3f0909030009y505a30by769052258576bfeb@mail.gmail.com> <20090903071913.M84990@Robert-Eckardt.de> <20090903080558.M13772@Robert-Eckardt.de> <d36406630909030201l36be8f6em4296f7b24306ee57@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:01:28 +0100, krad wrote > 2009/9/3 Robert Eckardt <rol@robert-eckardt.de> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt > > <Robert.Eckardt@robert-eckardt.de> wrote: > > > > Do I have to be worried? > > > Is there a memory leak in the current ZFS implementation? > > > Why is used space growing slower than free space is shrinking? > > > Is there some garbage collection needed in ZFS? > > > > > > Besides, although the backup server has 3 GB RAM I had to tune arc_max > > > to 150MB to copy the backed-up data from an 2.8TB ZFS (v6) to the > > > 4.5 TB ZFS (v13) by "zfs send|zfs recv" without kmalloc panic. > > > (I.e., the defaults algorithm was not sufficient.) > > > do a " zfs list -t all" > > you will see all snapshots and zvols then as well Uups, sorry for asking. Everything o.k. after "zfs destroy big/big@backup" :-( I hope the info on arc_max will stay useful. Regards, Robert -- Dr. Robert Eckardt --- Robert.Eckardt@Robert-Eckardt.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090903094501.M34547>