Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:19:46 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base Message-ID: <20090921161946.GA21946@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <4AB7A708.5080209@FreeBSD.org> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <200909211237.n8LCbkxV017364@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <200909211309.n8LD9eTr017654@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20090921160955.GZ21946@elvis.mu.org> <4AB7A708.5080209@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> [090921 09:17] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein skrev: > >* Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> [090921 06:10] wrote: > >>In article <20090921130346.GY21946@elvis.mu.org> you write: > >> > >>>I think he already explained that it's supposedly much better than > >>>window(1) with a kinder license than screen(1). > >>> > >>>We really ought to ship with a screen(1)-like program. > >>sudo pkg_add -r screen > >> > >>Problem solved. > > > >WORKS GREAT ESP WHEN NETWORK IS DOWN AND SOMEONE NEEDS MY HELP. > > > >WORKS AWESOME ON REALLY OLD MACHINES WHERE PACKAGES NO LONGER > >EXIST. > > > >Note: Apple, which cares more about a usable userland unix than > >we do at this time has screen installed in base as well. > > OpenBSD has tmux in base...and I've seen discussions on the NetBSD lists > about importing tmux (as a window(1) replacement) into NetBSD base as > well... :-) I dunno Joel, we wouldn't want to get crazy and ship a system that was usable out of the box, I'd like to go back to a Solaris circa 1999 like system, y'know, kernel+/bin/sh, don't need much more than that y'know... -- - Alfred Perlstein .- AMA, VMOA #5191, 03 vmax, 92 gs500, 85 ch250 .- FreeBSD committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090921161946.GA21946>