Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:35:39 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: first patch for process-shared semaphore Message-ID: <20091223203539.400bbfda@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <4B32C25A.8040703@freebsd.org> References: <4B317741.8080004@freebsd.org> <20091223074707.2a7ca9d6@kan.dnsalias.net> <4B32C25A.8040703@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:22:34 +0800 David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> wrote: > > libthr does not require semaphore, it implements semaphore, > it is easier than other ways to implement the process-shared. > Let me rephrase: I do not think semaphores belong in libthr. They should be either in libc or in librt. -- Alexander Kabaev [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLMsVvQ6z1jMm+XZYRAjYbAKCBSP5xlkf2FtW59aGnANESoejTPQCeJNg6 ys59wGlyx/A4wSDBq783IkM= =rf71 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091223203539.400bbfda>