Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 22:16:26 +0200 From: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> To: xorquewasp@googlemail.com Cc: Mikle Krutov <nekoexmachina@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 wine on amd64 - DRI a lost cause? Message-ID: <201007012216.30638.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100701120006.GA28132@logik.internal.network> References: <20100624121141.GA40498@logik.internal.network> <AANLkTinciz7Qzlb9gVsHtgRKWMXVWD258nyfaMqxWapu@mail.gmail.com> <20100701120006.GA28132@logik.internal.network>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thursday 01 July 2010 14:00:06 xorquewasp@googlemail.com wrote: > On 2010-07-01 15:28:00, Mikle Krutov wrote: > > Sorry for late-answer, but why are you running wine in jail? > > May be that's the source of the problem. > > For me, it was just installed into /usr/local/ as some other > > > > program, some 32bit libs were in lib32, and so on. > > As mentioned, I've tried it in a jail, a plain chroot and also completely > unchrooted and unjailed. > > Wine itself works fine but DRI doesn't. > > I recently wrote to freebsd-hackers@ and the response wasn't exactly > positive. Seems 32-bit DRI is basically expected to fail when talking > to a 64-bit kernel. Wine's not the one at fault here. Have you tried the packages from http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/wine/ They worked for me with nvidia and intel. Regards, David [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkws954ACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKX5wCfWiKgNSq0i1IIBIQV9Wpsq/r5 J9oAnRt5Q843GipJAJ3BimTmRQuYkpky =DI4C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201007012216.30638.naylor.b.david>