Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:41:09 +0000
From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: {arch}/conf/DEFAULTS and uart
Message-ID: <20100909194109.GA64914@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100909191750.GA58228@freebsd.org>
References: <20100909191750.GA58228@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS. is > this really necessary? shouldn't DEFAULTS only contain vital devices/options > without a kernel on a specific arch won't function at all? jhb just explained to me, that the uart entry in DEFAULTS is not a controller or something like that, but the uart backend to use *if* uart gets defined in the kernel config. sorry for the noise folks. cheers. alex > > cheers. > alex > > -- > a13x -- a13x
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100909194109.GA64914>