Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:04:28 +0100 From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> To: Michael Reifenberger <mike@reifenberger.com> Cc: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD-Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bsdinstall-amd64-20110313 remarks Message-ID: <20110321100428.GN90300@e.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103210906001.48840@gw.reifenberger.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103210906001.48840@gw.reifenberger.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Wh9K+VmLHGaPX0mq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > Hi, > yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the followin= g=20 > remarks: >=20 > - At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab > - Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantag= e? > - The usage of an UFS-Label for root mounting should be more flexible - UFS-labeling does not work I let bsdinstall partition the disk automatically and edited the proposed partitions to add labels, but after the first boot, neither fstab nor /dev/label showed any labels. --Wh9K+VmLHGaPX0mq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk2HIqwACgkQKc512sD3afizbQCeLSAjZNT4uB69h7YzQoSPiUOY KBEAn3MS+v+Y+Zk/BXhN7YQUc2+u65zA =u0GI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Wh9K+VmLHGaPX0mq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110321100428.GN90300>